|
Increasingly, mid cap funds have turned out to be a
popular avenue for investors. The sharp growth clocked by mid cap
stocks/funds has no doubt played its role in endearing them to investors.
However, since mid cap funds as an equity fund category, does not have
enough funds with established track records (over 3-5 years), selecting
the right mid cap fund can be quite a task. The Personalfn Research Team
presents 2 mid cap funds that aggressive investors should consider
investing in.
Mid cap funds are mandated to invest predominantly in
the stocks/shares of mid cap companies. Such companies are usually
under-researched, thereby providing an investment opportunity that is yet
to be recognised by the market. Well-managed mid cap companies offer
higher growth potential and can clock above-average returns over longer
time frames (3-5 years).
On the flipside, investment in mid cap companies tend
to be riskier. Being under-researched there may not be critical
information for an accurate evaluation of its prospects; in effect the
fund manager could make a wrong investment call impacting the fund’s
fortunes adversely. Also, the possibility of mid cap stocks remaining
illiquid for some time also exists.
Franklin India Prima and Sundaram Select Midcap are two
mid cap funds that we like; risk-taking investors should consider
investing in them. Two factors that lead us to choose these funds over
others include a) established track record b) process-driven investment
approach.
1. Track record
In the mid cap equity fund segment, track record which is important
anyways, assumes even more significance. This is because mid caps are
inherently risky and if you have decided to go with a particular mid cap
fund, it better have a well-established track record over 3-5 years of
selecting well-managed mid caps that have created wealth for their
investors. Both Franklin India Prima and Sundaram Select Midcap have track
records of at least 5 years (the latter will complete 5 years later in
this month).
2. Process-driven investment approach
In the process-driven investment approach, the fund house is not held
hostage by a star fund manager/Chief Investment Officer (CIO) who calls
the shots. In other words the processes/investment ideas belong to the
star fund manager, when he leaves the processes/ideas go with him. This
hurts both the fund house and investors, the latter in particular are left
worrying whether the fund can do without him.
At Personalfn, our preference is for process-driven
fund houses that have well-established processes. The fund manager/CIO
plays an important role to the extent allowed to him by the investment
processes. Both mid cap funds we like fall into this category; they are
guided by well-defined processes which leaves no scope for star fund
managers although in K. N. Sivasubramanian (Franklin Templeton Mutual
Fund) and N. Prasad (Sundaram BNP Paribas Mutual Fund) you have 2 very
competent fund managers.
Fund comparison
| Midcap Funds |
NAV
(Rs) |
Top 10
Stocks (%) |
1-Yr
(%) |
3-Yr
(%) |
5-Yr
(%) |
Since
Incep.
(%) |
Std.
Dev.
(%) |
Sharpe
Ratio
(%) |
| Sundaram BNP Paribas Select Midcap |
98.19 |
20.60 |
37.0 |
66.2 |
- |
59.5 |
6.20 |
0.51 |
|
Franklin India Prima Fund |
225.06 |
48.84 |
45.1 |
48.4 |
50.5 |
25.8 |
6.85 |
0.30 |
| CNX Midcap |
|
|
54.7 |
45.1 |
39.9 |
|
|
|
|
(Source: Credence Analytics. NAV data as on June 28, 2007.
Top 10 stocks as on May 31, 2007. Growth over 1-Yr is compounded
annualised. The Sharpe Ratio is a measure of the returns offered by
the fund vis-à-vis those offered by a risk-free instrument. Standard
deviation highlights the element of risk associated with the fund.)
|
Sundaram Select Midcap Fund
Sundaram BNP Paribas Select Midcap Fund (SBNPM) launched in July 2002,
maintains a well-diversified portfolio by investing in a larger number of
mid cap stocks (compared to peers). Given the inherent risk in mid caps,
this can help in reducing the overall risk of the portfolio through
diversification.
Cash is king
Another highlight of the fund is that it holds cash for strategic
purpose. Put simply, this means that if the fund is not comfortable with
stock market levels, it resorts to increasing cash allocation until such a
time when the stock market scenario changes to its liking. This move has
helped the fund and its investors considerably, a case in point is the
market crash in May 2006 when the fund’s 35% cash allocation saved the day
for investors.
NAV returns
Over 3-Yr, the fund’s NAV (net asset value) has appreciated by an
impressive 66.2% CAGR (compounded average growth return). The fund is on
the verge of completing 5-Yr in the industry; hence, its since inception
return (59.5% CAGR) is representative of how the fund has performed over
this time frame.
Volatility
SBNPM's track record in countering volatility (Standard Deviation
6.20%) is relatively impressive. This implies that SBNPM's high growth
performance has come at lower volatility, which is something of a rarity
in the mid cap equity fund segment in particular. On the same lines, SBNPM
clocks the most impressive performance on the risk-adjusted return
parameter (Sharpe Ratio 0.51%). This implies that the SBNPM has more to
show for in terms of a return per unit of risk taken.
Diversification
The fund pursues a very well diversified investment strategy. In the
mid cap funds segment, investors are unlikely to find a more diversified
fund in terms of stocks. It is clear that within a high risk area like mid
caps, the fund's idea of de-risking the portfolio involves populating the
portfolio with a larger number of mid cap stocks. As on May 31, 2007, the
fund had 114 companies in its portfolio, although an unusually high
number, a usual feature in the fund's portfolio. The top 10 stocks in the
fund's portfolio accounted for 20.6% of net assets. At Personalfn, we
believe that a diversified equity fund should hold no more than 40% of its
assets in the top 10 holdings.
Franklin India Prima fund
Franklin India Prima Fund (FIPF) launched in December 1993 has been in
existence for well over a decade. The fund has an impressive track record
across time frames and market phases; this is evident in its net asset
value (NAV) appreciation. The fund has clocked a growth of 48.4% CAGR and
50.5% CAGR over the 3-Yr and 5-Yr periods respectively. While there have
been some concerns in the recent past about FIPF’s performance and
investment calls, in our view given the wealth of experience of the fund
management team, this is more of a short-term blip.
Diversification
FIPF is mandated to invest primarily in stocks of the mid and small
sized companies. For some time now its portfolio has a little more than
the 40% net assets (in its top 10 stocks) that we like to see in a
diversified equity fund. The portfolio displays a fair degree of
consistency in terms of stock picks.
Volatility
With a Standard Deviation of 6.85%, FIPF performs well on the
volatility control front. This means that the fund has succeeded in
delivering on the returns parameter at lower levels of risk. On Sharpe
Ratio (0.30%), FIPF’s performance isn’t as robust.
We
also did a small analysis to determine how much Rs 100 invested around 5
years ago (given that SBNPM was launched on July 30, 2002) in SBNPM, FIPF
and the CNX Midcap has grown over the years. The results are there for all
to see. Rs 100 invested 5 years ago in the CNX Midcap would have
appreciated to Rs 610.0. On the other hand, the same amount invested in
SBNPM and FIPF would have grown to Rs 992.0 and Rs 849.0 respectively.
As our research underscores, both SBNPM and FIPF offer
an attractive investment proposition to risk-taking investors. To that
end, they should consider investing in either or both the funds in line
with their investment objectives. |